Members
Two hundred and twelve adults in heterosexual relationships (106 women, Mdecadess = years; 106 men, Mage age = years) and two hundred and eight adults in same-gender relationships (72 couples self-identified as gay: Mage = 34.1 years; 72 couples self-identified as lesbian: Mage = 33.3 years years). Couples were required to have been together romantically for a minimum of 6 months and to come to the lab with their partner to participate in the study. The average relationship length for all couples was 4.8 years (SD = 6.6 years). Exclusion criteria limited participation to individuals currently without serious, chronic health problems or any health issues (e.g., diabetes) that affected their eating behaviors. (If participants engaged in disordered eating behaviors but did not conceptualize them as disordered, they may have participated).
The players within the heterosexual relationships have been mainly Eu American (72% European Western, 10% Dark colored, 8% Hispanic/Latino, 7% Western Western, and you may 3% “other”). Users advertised personal revenues inside selections: “ $75,000” (1%). Likewise, 41.1% stated that they certainly were matchmaking and not cohabitating, thirty-two.4% stated that these were cohabitating (coping with each other), and you will twenty-six.5% stated that they were partnered.
The players into the lgbt relationships have been as well as mostly Western european-American (70%; 14% Dark colored, 10% Hispanic/Latino, 3% Far eastern American, 3% “other”). Users stated personal revenues in the ranges: “ 0 suggests certain quantity of frustration. The exam–retest accuracy because of it scale might have been reported to be an effective [0.79; (33)], and this level has been discovered having predictive legitimacy [elizabeth.grams., it’s associated with lbs updates and dieting practices various other mature samples; (34, 35)].
Matchmaking Top quality
New Marital Relations Survey [MIS; (36)] was applied to evaluate participants’ matchmaking quality. That it 15-items measure contains two subscales of love and you can argument. The brand new like level queried players using 10 factors and additionally “How the amount of time could you feel on the your partner?” The brand new argument level queried participants playing with five products including “How often could you plus partner argue with one another?” For each and every goods was rated toward good nine-section Likert level off 0 = “not” to eight = “greatly.” Activities determining conflict was basically opposite coded (hence assessing “harmony”) and you can a total ingredient get from matchmaking top quality try determined. The initial format of your own MIS was designed to determine hitched couples’ relationships high quality; brand new scale try modified for it studies to read “mate” and you will “partner,” in place of “lover.” The MIS are reliable along side subsamples of partners (?s = 0.77–0.89) and has now been used effectively various other degree of exact same-sex partners, discussing predictive authenticity [age.g., (19)].
Relationships Length
Users advertised its relationships duration by the answering: “For how many months are you presently consistently a part of the personal mate?” Answers are showed in years having hottest girls Milan convenient translation.
Covariates
Analyses thought covariates almost certainly for the gaining weight and you can relationships condition: ages, participants’ gender (coded ?step one = men, 1 = female), and you can sexual direction. (Gender and sexual orientation including was thought to be moderators within the analyses).
Analytic Package
SPSS variation 28 and you can HLM adaptation seven were utilized to own descriptive analyses and test analysis aims. Data was featured getting completeness; the amount of missing analysis towards any adjustable used in analyses varied from 0 to just one.4%. Listwise removal was utilized to own missing analysis. To help you take into account the fresh low-independence of information off someone nested inside matchmaking, multilevel acting was applied to check on to possess gender and you will sexual positioning variations in within this-people details and also to shot research aims (37). Proceeded parameters was category mean based at the top step 1 (within-couples) and you may huge suggest depending during the peak 2 (between-couples).